stack em baby!
Home › Forums › Bit Char-G, Digi-Q and other Micros › Bit CharG and Micro Radio Controlled – Technical › stack em baby!
- This topic has 25 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 21 years, 7 months ago by
jamiekulhanek.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 2, 2004 at 5:31 am #12044
Here it is, triple stacked fets on a bit PCB.
The torque is killa!
Just thought I d share……..
:p
ph2t.
-
March 2, 2004 at 5:32 am #49915
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA:p:8ball:
-
March 2, 2004 at 5:37 am #49916
You’ll be eating those words tomorrow when the beast this PCB will be sitting in makes mincemeat of your ramp!
ph2t.
-
March 2, 2004 at 10:57 am #49917
How high can we go?
So I guess in Mini Z terminology, this is a 4 x 3 stack. :DuA -
March 2, 2004 at 4:10 pm #49919
Usually in mini Z’s we only modd the ESC side, because the FET on the motor side can supply plenty of juice to the tiny steering motor. So i guess its more of like a 3×2 stack for each the steering and Motor.:smiley16:
-
March 2, 2004 at 7:06 pm #49926Quote:Usually in mini Z’s we only modd the ESC side, because the FET on the motor side can supply plenty of juice to the tiny steering motor. So i guess its more of like a 3×2 stack for each the steering and Motor.:smiley16:
nah dude:dead:. The steering is not fet modded in the above pic. There are four fets that combine together to make the motor drive. On the mini-z there are two fets per micro-8 package, that’s why you only stack two actual components on the z pcb.. So it is still a 4×3 so blah!:smiley2:
ph2t.
-
March 2, 2004 at 8:49 pm #49928
oooh, ph2t has been studying. good stuff ph2t, you are a real nerd.
-
March 3, 2004 at 3:34 am #49931Quote:So it is still a 4×3 so blah!:smiley2:
ph2t.
Hahahaha i get ya now, i know very little about the bit electronics:p
-
March 3, 2004 at 3:35 am #49932
Thats right they are only those weeny little 3 pin FETs, so thats why you need 4 stacks.
-
March 4, 2004 at 8:58 am #49944
Hey hey!
Nice mod, ph2t!
But jamie.. Remember that this probaly would be faster that a stock mini-z!
🙂
-
March 4, 2004 at 6:48 pm #49947
you reckon?? 18km/h is the speed of a stock z.
-
March 4, 2004 at 7:25 pm #49953
jamie, remember ph2t’s original monster? that pushed 20 kph, accurately measured on micro amps’ dyno. that was a single stack dual cell. he’s using the same drivetrain setup in this one, and this is a quad cell with triplestack fets. do tha math!:evil::8ball:
-
March 4, 2004 at 7:43 pm #49954
ok thats gotta be about 40km/h
-
March 5, 2004 at 3:38 am #49961
u would be able to get some killa air with that!:evil:
-
March 5, 2004 at 10:16 pm #49967
I think I might know how the landings turn out though. :D:D:D.
Somehow, I dont think the occupants would survive.
:)uA -
March 7, 2004 at 6:21 am #49970
these fets dont appreciate a bit of rough play eh?
-
March 7, 2004 at 6:42 am #49972
He means the little bit people inside the car:):smiley2:
-
March 7, 2004 at 6:48 am #49973
that was what i thought, there should be someone in the car when it crashed because we are way better driver than them.:smiley2:
-
March 7, 2004 at 6:55 am #49974
yeah its their fault the car crashed!!! we are all perfect! hmmmmm 1/64 crash test dummies….
-
March 8, 2004 at 8:24 pm #49986
micro amps, is it true you cant fet a superbcg?
-
March 8, 2004 at 10:15 pm #49987
Yeah, pretty much.
I spent a while on it a few months ago with no result. Things might be different now with the extra stuff I’ve learnt, but there’s still the problem of the cars ‘running on’ when they go out of range, and that was enough to turn me off them.
:sad:uA -
March 9, 2004 at 3:49 am #49992
thats bad news!
any ideas why it didnt work?
any way to boost the transmitter to increase range?
i have got 1 super bit (out of three) that doesnt have the “run on” problem, and the other two only get affected severly when the power is almost emty.
-
March 9, 2004 at 5:26 am #49996
SBCGs are pretty good. they do deliever more current to the motor than BCG. But not as much as a FETmod. There is no problem for a SBCG to be same accleration as a FETmod car with same motor on a very smooth surface. I’m happy with SBCG apart from they have less custom mods right now. THey are verylow so they are really good for on-road racing. I put a lowered shell on a SBCG chassis with 4.2 and it never fliped!
-
March 9, 2004 at 7:11 am #49998
i am forever sold on the sbcg’s. they are much nicer to look at, race and the controller feels so nice compared to standard bcg. i hope to get the ferrari set next and then get two more chassis’ to complete the set of 6 frequencies.
then i’m going to get 5 mates to try and beat me on my own track at once!
has anyone compared the pcb’s of the sbcg and bcg yet? what are the differences appart from crystals and chips?
-
March 10, 2004 at 6:23 am #50014
um…the size of SBCG PCB is samller(obviously). And not much other than crystals and chips because that’s what they made up of.
-
March 10, 2004 at 4:57 pm #50016
That i can see there is no crystal on either PCB.
The SBCG PCB uses revrsed logic signals which is why they run on sometimes i believe.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.