0-100cm car acceleration test
Home › Forums › Bit Char-G, Digi-Q and other Micros › Bit CharG and Micro Radio Controlled – Discussion › 0-100cm car acceleration test
- This topic has 9 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 22 years, 9 months ago by
jamiekulhanek.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
July 10, 2003 at 4:50 am #11025
Well, I tested my dual battery Bit Char-A clone. And it broke my own record. It done 100cm in 0.5 sec.
I just wish to see people post their results under this topic. Specially for people who has FET modded cars.
-
July 10, 2003 at 1:51 pm #24050
Why dont you try 6.25 metres??? That is the scale 1/4 mile.
-
July 10, 2003 at 3:13 pm #24054
That’d provide more accurate times for people to compare to also. starting and stopping a timer in under a second leaves a lot of room for huan error and errors in reflexes.
-
July 10, 2003 at 3:30 pm #24055
True dave, i run the 1/4 mile about 3-5 times then take an average.
-
July 10, 2003 at 5:24 pm #23986
Sounds like a good plan.
-
July 10, 2003 at 8:58 pm #23990
How did you manage to time it and get a result of .5 secs?? obviously not a hand held stop watch?? major human error involved!!
-
July 11, 2003 at 3:49 am #23916
i measured up 1M distance. Then i setup two sensors at each end. i put the car at one end which push against the sensor which will start a stop watch once the car left the sensor. when the car hit the other sensor at the other end. the stop watch stops. i run the test 10 times and the average will be the result.
-
July 11, 2003 at 6:03 pm #23711
Ok, i was gonna say, the human reflex is about .25 seconds, so thats 1/2 second for the timing.
-
July 11, 2003 at 9:03 pm #23721
measuring .5sec on a .25 sec tolerance is the same as saying that an oylmpic swimming pool is 50M long + or – 12.5M.
Not very accuract I’m glad to see some sensors where used to state such a small time scale.
-
July 14, 2003 at 3:02 am #23047
Ok. I run my car 6.25M a few times. And the average is 2.76sec. i want to see more people post their results here.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.