MicroSizers/Bit Char-G Plane

Home Forums Floating & Flying – Discussion MicroSizers/Bit Char-G Plane

Viewing 14 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #12403
      MattPaintballer
      Participant
      • Posts: 19

      Hello. I am wanting to do two things. I want to make a plane out of my MicroSizer, and I want to make 2 of my MS s really good for racing. But the racing ones are kinda off topic. Okay, I know how to make the coil part of an actuator. But what is the deal with the neodmium magnet? How do I put that on, and once I figure that out, how do I hook up the actuator so it works? Will a high torque 4.2 motor be enough to fly the plane? How about 2? I was thinking of doing the following for my plane:

      Li-Po cell
      high torque 4.2
      MOSFET upgrade

    • #56622
      Impreza
      Participant
      • Posts: 1124

      Matt, have you seen the 21,000 rpm motor that comes as an add on for the new ZZ Monster Trucks? It is a bit bigger then the typical bit or ZZ motors so weight may be an issue? Would love to see a bit plane fly in person:) I always wondered about the limitations around Tx range.

    • #56625
      merc-blue
      Participant
      • Posts: 1547

      yeah get a superslick motor that will od it .. your PCb will need to have been fetted. as for the actuators thast all easy bassicialy mount a coil above and one below the flap tehn cut a hole in teh flap and glue in the magnet after all that use some wire to make it sit stragiht then ur done

    • #56639
      MattPaintballer
      Participant
      • Posts: 19

      I would like to stay more Bit-related. Plus 42,000 RPMs is higher than any SuperSlick motor.

    • #56641
      betty.k
      Participant
      • Posts: 2487

      4.2’s may rev higher but they won’t have much torque. the only bit plane i’ve seen was microamps’. it had a fetted pcb, lipo pack, and a micro flight motor (about the size of the zz monster’s motor). this plane was fairly slow so a 4.2 would be lucky if it created a breeze:8ball:

    • #56657
      micro_Amps
      Participant
      • Posts: 1290

      Insert picture isnt working for some reason.
      Have a look here….
      http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/AEFA_12_03/image/p1030710_750.jpg
      http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/AEFA_12_03/image/p1030558_750.jpg
      http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/AEFA_12_03/image/p1030563_750.jpg
      http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/sandringham_dec03/image/aaa_011203_p1030027_750.jpg
      http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/sandringham_dec03/image/aaa_011203_p1030028_750.jpg
      http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/sandringham_dec03/image/aaa_011203_p1030031_750.jpg
      Both planes fly perfectly, both BCG controlled with KP00 motors and lipo cells. The balsa one will take off from ground, the ‘foamy’ needs to be hand launched.
      BCG controlls (indoors) with the crip cap mod done will easily reach 50 meters, which is plenty for indoor flying.
      These pics were taken and Doncaster (Victoria) indoor sports center, the AEFA fly there every 4th Saturday.

      :)uA

      Edited by – micro_Amps on 01 November 2004 08:55:04

    • #56660
      icebreaka
      Participant
      • Posts: 347

      WOW 😯 😯

      I never knew you actually completed that.. WOW amazing work! 😀

    • #56661
      Impreza
      Participant
      • Posts: 1124

      NICE u. what do your buttons on the controller control? (I see rudder with the left/right).

      Edited by – Impreza on 01 November 2004 13:04:17

    • #56677
      micro_Amps
      Participant
      • Posts: 1290

      Yes, rudder (obviously) is for left and right.
      I use Forward for hi-speed (take-offs, climbing and turns) and I use Reverse for low speed, this speed is set to maintain flat level flight. A resistor is placed into the motor circuit to reduce motor power and the plane slows right down and just ‘hangs’ in the air flying at walking pace. The motor H-brigde is removed to allow 4 independant functions, or more depending on the RxTx combination.
      Amazing to watch, and flying indoors on a basketball court is kinda strange, but lots of fun.
      I’ll try and find some more pics to post as well. I was doing some plane mods for a couple of professors from Monash Uni, thats how those pics came to be hosted there. They saw the work I was doing on micro rc car mods and wanted to develop a micro plane, they supplied all the materials,I supplied the electronics and those photos were the result.
      :)uA

      EDIT: I have looked around the Monash site, I dont think there are any more pics of the BCG controlled planes.
      Credit must be given where its due, Prof. John Bird, Dr. Russ Naughton and Peter Mather all contributed to the micro rc ‘Rats’ pitured. There are now several different versions flying.

      Edited by – micro_Amps on 01 November 2004 21:25:58

    • #56681
      merc-blue
      Participant
      • Posts: 1547

      hey the guys at monah which monash.. clayton? is it the profesoors for the computer systems/eletrical department? with there planes and thair UAV modules?

    • #56682
      micro_Amps
      Participant
      • Posts: 1290

      Here’s another version, Peter Mather’s, inspired by my previous design.
      http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/sandringham_feb-may04/image/sandy_apl04_p4059918_750.jpg

      This one designed and built by Prof. Bird, electronics by uA
      http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/sandringham_jul04/image/p1090753.jpg

      Just to prove its BCG controlled, he has the controller in his other hand….
      http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/sandringham_jul04/image/p1100110.jpg
      And in flight….
      http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/sandringham_jul04/image/p1100073.jpg

      BCG motor ‘power’ geared….(from a different model, but its use IS possible, and very usable)
      http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/sandringham_aug04/image/p1110277.jpg

      uA

      Edited by – micro_Amps on 01 November 2004 21:51:27

    • #56683
      micro_Amps
      Participant
      • Posts: 1290

      Quote


      is it the profesoors for the computer systems/eletrical department? with there planes and thair UAV modules
      Quote



      Yes it is Clayton, (does the word Hargrave mean anything) and these are some seriously smart men, and I mean SERIOUSLY SMART !!! They would knock your socks off with the stories they tell of the achievements they have made in their respective fields. Awesome, yet very modest.

    • #56687
      merc-blue
      Participant
      • Posts: 1547

      yeah i did work expereince up there with them.. them guys are the reason i wanna do eletrical enginering.. i spent a week soldering PCBs and watching them work on a UAV module using microcontrolers and the old temperature (space being cold ground being warm) trick of flying around. i got to tell them what they were doing wrong (to do with eletrical interference issues) hehehe the good’ ol RC knowlage its was so obvious they probly knew just didnt think of it

    • #57767
      MattPaintballer
      Participant
      • Posts: 19

      I’m still confused on how to get the actuator thing to work… I know how to make one, just not how to attach it and stuff… Would a 3.8 have enough torque to fly the plane? For a plane, is torque more important than RPM, or vise versa? I have a MicroSizer, not a Bit, and I read that the boards are different on the car and in the Tx. Where would the cripple cap be located? I could also just get a clone and use one… That would be more logical because they are cheaper than MS’s. I really want to make a MSPlane!

    • #59645
      jamiekulhanek
      Participant
      • Posts: 2563

      I used to build small indoor rubber powered planes called ‘Hangar Rats’ , the one i built actually won a few competitions, scoring worked by timing the plane from take off (ROG) till it landed. Sadly I decided to give it a go outdoors, it hit a thermal and was never seen again!

      Weigh not including rubber band was approx 7.5 g, 50cm wingspan, 10 cm chord.

      Due to the fact it needed to be rigid enough to withstand the force from a rubber band with 1000 turns, the fuselage was quite beefy, so with no rubber motor it could easily get away with having a lighter airframe.

Viewing 14 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.