2 Fast 2 Furious
Home › Forums › General Chat › 2 Fast 2 Furious
- This topic has 62 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 21 years, 8 months ago by
SurfmyStrat.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
June 8, 2003 at 2:19 am #11070
I just saw the movie and it is such a great movie. I think it is better than the first one, love the GTR. I really wish that tomy did bodies for an eclipse and evo, sucks that evo is only available in the kit or in that racing version. Really recommend the movie to all who love japanese cars.
-
June 8, 2003 at 5:26 am #28107
You still need the kit, but the Microsizer Pro comes with a yellow and a clear lancer body. I’d actually like to see a few more little ricers too. I’m not even all into them on the road, but I’d honestly rather see that than a Lamo Countach
-
June 8, 2003 at 6:25 am #28110
Havnt seen the movie yet but the cars look sweet as!!! was thinking about giving some of my own cars the same look, kind of a fast and furious set. Same paint job, some cool decals and maybe even some neon lights for underneath the car!!!:D
-
June 8, 2003 at 10:01 am #28112
iunno.. i think that CG is gettin used in all these new movies (matrix 2, X2, FnF2) its like they’re bored of just filming real things.. plus that computer animated drifting looked really horrible… i never seen the movie yet.. but i seen the commercials and they convinced me to wait till it comes to video.
-
June 8, 2003 at 10:03 am #28105
i saw the movie the first show it was playing in my local movie theatre yesterday, man that was amazing, i loved that evo. I wonder if theyre gonna make another one, maybe too slow, and a little less furious??? or 3 fast 3 furious??? you never know. One of the parts i loved best was in the beggining when they were getting the package from the lamborgini (spelling error <- ) that was awesome, im happy the mustang got crushed cause i hate mustangs!!! GO SEE THE MOVIE IF YOU HAVE NOT YET BECAUSE ITS AMAZING!!! WAY BETTER THEN THE FIRST!!!
-
June 8, 2003 at 12:40 pm #28128
I was gonna tell my favourite part, but I dont want to ruin it for those who havn’t seen it. I’ll give you a clue surfy, it involves the GTR and the Supra and a bridge that has been raised.
-
June 8, 2003 at 3:21 pm #28133
Ohh in the beginning when that thing happens and then the other thing happens and theres a bush???:p
-
June 8, 2003 at 3:57 pm #28117
i reckon it was a good film, but a bit overated, and for all those that dis an evo, now you cann’t talk, there is a bit of cg, especially at the ending credits which i thought were mad, that gt-r looked similar to the one at autosalon last year, if i could upload the pic i’ld show you, no one that loves cars will be disapointed, don’t miss it!:p
-
June 8, 2003 at 4:33 pm #28118
so gay that the R34 didnt last long..
-
June 8, 2003 at 8:15 pm #28102
Im going to a movie marathon tonight so ill prolly see it then (unless the sheilas drag us to something lamer)
-
June 8, 2003 at 11:16 pm #28066
*laughs* All I’m gonna say is that while I’ll be handing down to see the flick I would take any represenation of the cars as being fairly unrealistic.
The last one was full of gaping technical errors and incorrect applications of the various bits of technology and I suspect this one will be just as bad.
That said there’s along history of cars being manipulated to meet a movie makers needs. (The immediate example would be Bullet, where the Dodge needed to be down tuned and undertyred for the filming becuase it was creaming the modified Mustang too easily 😉 )
--
Site Owner Guy. -
June 8, 2003 at 11:23 pm #28067
haha.. jamies a pimp.
-
June 9, 2003 at 4:22 pm #28078
Gotta hate it when your floor falls out due to a problem with ur manifold… what a lame part that was.
-
June 9, 2003 at 5:50 pm #28082
hasnt that ever happened to you??? man happens to me everyday, driving to the grocery store, boom floor falls out, bring it to the mechanic turns out its the manifold… whatcha gonna do??? :smiley2:
-
June 9, 2003 at 10:40 pm #28053
shhhhhh stop ruining the worst parts for meeee! i still havent seen it :P:P
oh yah.. my friends manifold almost killed us… he had an 86 ford tempo we named 1.the tempSHO and 2.shitbox1
he also has a pinto…….. wat a guy.
ne ways.. his manifold was like.. cracked/seperated.. so the car sounded like a friggin fartpiper.. and had crazy fumes too.. we used to get so high offa that car…..lmao!!
but of course he managed to destroy it… oh well.. i guess thats wat happens to $400 cars….
hahaha.. we’re supin his pinto up.. its goona be the PIMPto……. i made up that name 😛 lmao.. im like the designer for it.. and he is the labourer and final decision maker….. its goona have a bed.. always gotta have a bed.. cant wait to cruze it this summer holidays.. now thats fun shizzit…..
ne ways.
bye! -
June 10, 2003 at 6:02 am #27964
One of the parts that blew me up the most in the first one was when Captain Jetta was like “Yo, that dude in the Honda 2000 (S2000) thinks he can beat me.” I just sat there thinking, he can moron, you’re driving a JETTA.
I got dragged to the first one, and wouldn’t go to this one, but my father and I helped them buy some of the cars (the only one I KNOW they used is the vette that wrecks with the Mustang).
Why couldn’t I have been a part of Saving Private Ryan!?!
-
June 10, 2003 at 8:48 pm #27982Quote:(The immediate example would be Bullet, where the Dodge needed to be down tuned and undertyred for the filming becuase it was creaming the modified Mustang too easily 😉 )
“Bullit”
… and the Furd needed to be mod ‘cos a bog-stock one
could barely go up the SanFran hills… 👿 -
June 10, 2003 at 10:20 pm #27912
*nods* you are very corect Panda, Bullit is it – ’twas late a I was in a rush when I posted 😉
A.
--
Site Owner Guy. -
June 11, 2003 at 5:42 pm #27937
On the topic of 2 Fast 2 Furious has anyone seen this?
http://www.shockwave.com/sw/content/zipzaps2
--
Site Owner Guy. -
June 11, 2003 at 6:42 pm #27938
ohh yea, ive played that game tons of times before, heres a hint, once you get the s2000, you can use that to get the evo and than use that car to get the rest… Fun game, gets boring after a while though
-
June 11, 2003 at 6:50 pm #27939
that game is great, much better than the previous zip zaps games. It has better music too.
-
June 11, 2003 at 7:10 pm #27941
the music??? its redundant, it just says “to fast to furious” over and over, than when you race its cheesy techno, if this is better the first ones music must have been like the music from pong (1970’s):D
-
June 11, 2003 at 7:37 pm #27943
oh ok, I didn’t hear it during the race, the first fast and furious zip zaps game was quite repeditive.
-
June 13, 2003 at 12:06 am #27828
I saw it the other night, it was ok, but it was the biggest load of sh*t ive seen to date.
That jump = impossible, and basically everything else that happens is crap.
Good point shypo about the floor falling out due to manifold probs.
BTW, anybody know why the R34 had those gas sprayer things, and do they do anything?
-
June 13, 2003 at 12:27 am #27830
I think they are just for show those sprayer things. Seemed to move the crowd out of the way.
-
June 14, 2003 at 3:39 am #27796
I’m starting to sound like the ebay correspondent but anyhows . . . . they have made fast and furious zip zaps ;o)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3134418088&category=44024
and . . . .
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3135001834&category=2565
didn’t takem long
-
June 14, 2003 at 4:05 am #27797
I like the idea of putting that RC in a NOS bottle as the package.
-
June 14, 2003 at 8:44 pm #27376
is that first one (red one) a Bit size car? or is it like.. a bigger r/c car?
-
June 14, 2003 at 8:44 pm #27678
is that first one (red one) a Bit size car? or is it like.. a bigger r/c car?
-
June 14, 2003 at 10:12 pm #27382
are you talking about the 2 links to that ebay site? I think they are zip zaps which have a longer body and chassis.
-
June 14, 2003 at 10:12 pm #27684
are you talking about the 2 links to that ebay site? I think they are zip zaps which have a longer body and chassis.
-
June 14, 2003 at 10:42 pm #27383
both of them are zip zaps? that one still doesnt look like a zip zap or bit to me.. i meant the second link.. not the first..
-
June 14, 2003 at 10:42 pm #27685
both of them are zip zaps? that one still doesnt look like a zip zap or bit to me.. i meant the second link.. not the first..
-
June 14, 2003 at 11:01 pm #27384
You’re right, I dont think the second is a zip zap, but it does look like a longer body still.
-
June 14, 2003 at 11:01 pm #27686
You’re right, I dont think the second is a zip zap, but it does look like a longer body still.
-
June 15, 2003 at 2:41 am #27386
it looks kinda like a Can Car.. or w/e.. actually thats prolly wat it is.. and its from FnF1.. not FnF2.. looks about the same size as my Tyco Canned Heat S2000.. it says its 1:64th scale… lmao.. iunno how much that is tho… haha.. ne ways…
outerettes
-
June 15, 2003 at 2:41 am #27688
it looks kinda like a Can Car.. or w/e.. actually thats prolly wat it is.. and its from FnF1.. not FnF2.. looks about the same size as my Tyco Canned Heat S2000.. it says its 1:64th scale… lmao.. iunno how much that is tho… haha.. ne ways…
outerettes
-
June 15, 2003 at 2:50 am #27387
I know that 1:64 is bigger than a bit, I dont think its by a lot though. I think hotwheels/matchbox cars are 1:64 scale.
-
June 15, 2003 at 2:50 am #27689
I know that 1:64 is bigger than a bit, I dont think its by a lot though. I think hotwheels/matchbox cars are 1:64 scale.
-
June 15, 2003 at 4:14 am #27390
ohhhh.. ok.. so the mystery goes on :S
well we’ll figure it out!
-
June 15, 2003 at 4:14 am #27692
ohhhh.. ok.. so the mystery goes on :S
well we’ll figure it out!
-
June 15, 2003 at 10:04 am #27288
hey you guys, sorry for the lack of posts but im here at my sis’s in atlanta, just saw the movie again with her. I love that movie, plus i loved the flamethrower kits on the car…mmmm toasty:smiley2:
-
June 15, 2003 at 10:04 am #27590
hey you guys, sorry for the lack of posts but im here at my sis’s in atlanta, just saw the movie again with her. I love that movie, plus i loved the flamethrower kits on the car…mmmm toasty:smiley2:
-
June 15, 2003 at 11:30 am #27289
is that where flames come out of the exhaust??? i know how to do that.. ne one care to know??
-
June 15, 2003 at 11:30 am #27591
is that where flames come out of the exhaust??? i know how to do that.. ne one care to know??
-
June 15, 2003 at 3:43 pm #27292
yeah thats what they’re talking about, isn’t it just with a spark plug?
-
June 15, 2003 at 3:43 pm #27594
yeah thats what they’re talking about, isn’t it just with a spark plug?
-
June 15, 2003 at 5:38 pm #27293
yah.. spark plug hooked up to a toggle switch hooked up to the battery..
i learned it in the anarchists cookbook :D:D
peace
-
June 15, 2003 at 5:38 pm #27595
yah.. spark plug hooked up to a toggle switch hooked up to the battery..
i learned it in the anarchists cookbook :D:D
peace
-
June 15, 2003 at 6:25 pm #27295
hey its surfy, back home now, yea thats what a flamethrower kit is, hooks up to your exaust. They sell them now for about 100$$$USD and some you can get to shoot flames out for 30 feet, of course i dont see why you would need that unless you were barbecuing or something…:smiley2:
-
June 15, 2003 at 6:25 pm #27597
hey its surfy, back home now, yea thats what a flamethrower kit is, hooks up to your exaust. They sell them now for about 100$$$USD and some you can get to shoot flames out for 30 feet, of course i dont see why you would need that unless you were barbecuing or something…:smiley2:
-
June 15, 2003 at 8:14 pm #27302
yeah i knew a guy in Australia who had one that went about 30 feet, that was until they became illegal, like everything else to do with cars does here in Australia.
-
June 15, 2003 at 8:14 pm #27604
yeah i knew a guy in Australia who had one that went about 30 feet, that was until they became illegal, like everything else to do with cars does here in Australia.
-
June 15, 2003 at 9:49 pm #27306
that movie sucked… 3 races in the whole movie.. unrealistic as. I hated it
-
June 15, 2003 at 9:49 pm #27608
that movie sucked… 3 races in the whole movie.. unrealistic as. I hated it
-
June 15, 2003 at 10:35 pm #27314
but y pay $100 when doin it urself would cost like…. $10 at most??
-
June 15, 2003 at 10:35 pm #27616
but y pay $100 when doin it urself would cost like…. $10 at most??
-
June 16, 2003 at 4:14 pm #27274Quote:yeah i knew a guy in Australia who had one that went about 30 feet, that was until they became illegal, like everything else to do with cars does here in Australia.
Dont that give ya the sh*ts, literally everything that is cool is illegal in this ‘free’ country…
-
June 16, 2003 at 4:14 pm #27576Quote:yeah i knew a guy in Australia who had one that went about 30 feet, that was until they became illegal, like everything else to do with cars does here in Australia.
Dont that give ya the sh*ts, literally everything that is cool is illegal in this ‘free’ country…
-
June 16, 2003 at 4:40 pm #27249
yeah even those tiny washer lights which i dont see how they could affect anyones driving are illegal.
-
June 16, 2003 at 4:40 pm #27551
yeah even those tiny washer lights which i dont see how they could affect anyones driving are illegal.
-
June 16, 2003 at 7:36 pm #27258
when you spray mist its almost impossible to see while driving
-
June 16, 2003 at 7:36 pm #27560
when you spray mist its almost impossible to see while driving
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.