color0

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 21 posts - 1 through 21 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #61498
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    To tide this thing over until my final exams are done, here’s the latest render straight out of the manual:

    render07ta4.jpg

    Special features include infinitely-adjustable suspension stiffness (yes, infinite :)), quick-release battery strap, Delrin everything in the rear pod, and a new motor mount that doesn’t need drilled cans.

    I haven’t come up with a good enough servo saver so you’ll need a servo saver intended for 1/18.

    With a Ti-shaft ball diff and the small electronics (the new ASF board is just one possibility) the MRCG should weigh around 135g without body; that’s 5-10g less than a similarly equipped MR02, not too bad.

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #61467
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    Funding isn’t a huge issue, but I’ll let you know ASAP when I can put a delivery date on these chassis.

    I took the RM car to the tennis court recently, drove over 2″x1″ ruts (2″ wide, 1″ deep!) in the concrete, heard the chassis smack the ground each time, but nothing broke or loosened up. That’s good from a durability standpoint. 🙂

    Even with the batteries pushed full forward, the car has massive rear grip. I was still using medium-compound GRP foams front and rear so it should’ve spun like a top, but all I got was a moderate degree of understeer and a little slide if you brake too hard and wrench the wheel. I’m more than happy with the results.

    Cleaning is about the same time-wise as your average MR02. For those concerned about electronics: I didn’t have any glitching issues despite all the dust on that board, but you may want to seal/heatshrink/case electronics if you drive in more rigorous environments. Indoor cars will have no issues.

    nsx05017cb1.jpg

    I’ve also been working on the MM production car, of course, and the G10 chassis parts are already done:

    mmproto003rc9.jpg

    And I’m just working on the production motor mounts (Delrin rear axle bearing carriers are done, just need to change some settings to make it easier to slip the bearings in). My apologies for the picture quality, but it’s tough to lean into the enclosure while trying to hold a steady hand, lol…

    milling019ir3.jpg

    Anyways, we’re pretty close to release and you can rest assured that the pictures and news will be everywhere when that happens. 🙂

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #61400
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    Hey guys,

    Sorry it’s been so long without a reply but I’ve been testing this chassis endlessly while trying to balance ‘work’ time (this project) with WORK time (college applications).

    Here’s the RM chassis soldiering through 24 hours of near-zero-maintenance lapping:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrikpi78MPI

    The RM chassis would definitely be production ready if I decided to do it but of course we’re going for the MM, which we (me and several GSR members) will be testing like mad for the rest of the year and into January. It’ll be released then, after baseline setups are determined for Ozite, RCP and concrete, instruction manuals are revised, etc.

    in reply to: anyone heard of the mini-z i chassis? #61339
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    Isn’t i-series the cheaper variant without the brake? The PCB is cheaper than the standard MR015/02’s.

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #61090
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    The horn pokes up from behind the tierod, and two flat G10 pieces are to be screwed on perpendicularly to the tierod to form a slot around whatever’s poking out of the servo horn.

    It’ll make sense when I finish the build. 🙂

    Edit: and it is, with the exception of a battery pack and a bearing set, complete! The tierod “horn” consists of two glued-on G10 pieces right now but as mentioned above will be screwed on in the final car.

    rmproto013sez7.jpg

    Edit: Considering the ball diff, motor mount and oil damper, it appears I’ve managed to shave a few grams off the MR02’s chassis weight:

    rmproto016gl9.jpg

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #61087
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    Got some more work done. The car is currently riding on plastic and metal bushings (!) so don’t expect it to run quite yet.

    Note the new uber-low oil damper config. Now the only things that even reach wheel level are an antenna, two motor wires and a crystal holder. That’s pretty darn low if you ask me. 😉

    rmproto007sp4.jpg

    rmproto010un3.jpg

    Front end detail: Kingpins are held up by exactly 1/8″ of fiberglass milled to spec, it’s stiff. I also got a clean conversion on the HS-50; you’d have to know beforehand that it was a 3-wire servo… 🙂

    rmproto008nd6.jpg

    Rear end detail: Got those side springs in, they work well and don’t click on the spring perches as I had worried about earlier. Also illustrates the height of the oil damper and the amount of leeway you have to shift the batteries back and forth.

    rmproto009yy0.jpg

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #61202
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    First functional prototype!

    Pics first.

    rmproto002lo5.jpg

    rmproto001ql4.jpg

    rmproto003nl4.jpg

    rmproto004xr1.jpg

    Comments:

    1) The mill countersunk two of the holes a little deeper than the rest. This might have something to do with my fixturing platform (it’s not perfectly trued yet), so I’ll look into it.
    2) I accidentally used climb milling for everything, and had to file the parts a bit to get the finish you see here. Still, not bad.
    3) The chassis went together very smoothly. After the finishing filing, I had only minimal filing to do to make the kingpins fit into the holders. And once in, they are very snug.
    4) The rear suspension is a good stiffness up and down, but the roll stiffness is rather high, even for my tastes. I do not know how this will factor into real-world driving yet.
    5) The front end will not flex unless you hit something really hard. I’ve been testing it with Kyosho hard springs and so far there is no visible flex.
    6) The tierod movement is a little bit stiffer than the MR02, although this is partially because I preloaded the hard springs.

    All in all a decent job, I hope to have the elecs soldered together quite soon and some bearings, wheels and tires (doh, I sold ’em…) and this car will be ready to go!

    in reply to: Electro’s Xmod #61264
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    Henal, the Xmod-style upper ‘decks’ are a lame excuse for a plate of CF that should be spanning all four suspension towers. I can almost guarantee you that you will see a difference if you use one.

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #61258
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    I tried it again immediately after the first and I saw the Z axis jam coming up, which led to the entire Z calibration being offset some 1mm downwards. So I’m not too sure why that happened, if it’s mechanical I hope the grease will solve it, and if it’s software I hope I can find the source of the error by fiddling around with Mach 3.

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #61254
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    Ok, I’ve got good and bad news.

    Good news first: edge quality is perfect on the longer cuts.
    Bad news: edge quality on the countersinks has gone down.
    Worse news: the mill seems to jam up right around this one spot of travel. I have no idea where to look for the cure; the mill is freshly lubed up with WD-40 and the rails are clean. Yet there’s a slight grinding noise and sometimes the whole thing just jams while the CNC control software believes it’s still going.

    Check Exhibit A:

    milling005xi3.jpg

    in reply to: Electro’s Xmod #61253
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    Not binding per se, but the plastic standoffs and remaining stock parts can’t resist flex. Upper deck would be nice.

    It looks great though, CNC cut or hand?

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #61234
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    I was using the wrong units! D’oh. I have the feed rates right this time, and edge quality is much better, though the cutting bit didn’t go deep enough to separate the pieces entirely from the stock. (It turns out that this plate of fiberglass is slightly thicker than 1/32″.)

    If you look closely at the picture, you’ll notice there are two “kinds” of edges. I was playing around with the settings and found that really slow speeds (6mm/min) are really good but take forever, slightly higher speeds (15-30mm/min) are terrible, and the proper speed (150mm/min) nets nearly perfect cuts (check the outside edges of the flex plates).

    milling004un1.jpg

    So that’s my update. Since I have a 3-day weekend I should be able to do some more work on the fiberglass and get that all sorted out and perfect. The Delrin and aluminum parts may have to wait since I still need some screws to mount my micro vise to the rotary table. Rest assured I will get this done as fast as I possibly can!

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #61006
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    First batch of G10 prototype parts! The cut quality is no good, but it’s mainly because I used a ruined endmill to cut with. The holes will be countersunk later, no worries.

    millingpe4.jpg

    I plan to get these parts made correctly before moving on to the fancy 4-axis work, so check back for updates. 🙂

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #60994
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    Hi guys,

    It could, in theory, cut the outlines of PCB’s… but the copper tracks are another story.

    With any luck the retail price will be $75 or lower.

    At the moment of this posting I am running the prototype run of the 1/16″ thick G10 chassis parts. It’s taking a long time, but so far so good, no broken tools, no broken fiberglass, just a little dust up the lungs (heh…) and I’ll be sure to have this all optimized soon.

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #60962
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    Klims- I wish it would just take Rhinoceros files, lol… but no, I use another Rhino plug-in to calculate the path that the little endmill has to take to cut my parts out of Delrin, aluminum, G10, etc.

    I aimed for $75 price before, but since then I’ve been doing small design changes to lower that. The final price will be up to the retailer anyways, so my job is just to make it smarter-faster-stronger-lighter-cheaper. 🙂

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #60959
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    I bought a Taig for $1.8k, the ‘student’ price. 😀

    The CNC stuff has finally come! after multiple threats on my part to file an eBay dispute.

    I got the mill working, and ran a test program through it. Seems to work well, although I won’t be able to see the tolerances until I build some prototype parts. At any rate, the thing IS working at least, so I can finally legitimately say I’m on my way to getting this chassis produced for those interested. 😉

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #60919
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    Nope, for this kind of stuff Rhino > AutoCAD. It’s Rhinoceros. 🙂

    Thanks for the compliments guys. Now if only the guy I bought the CNC mill from would hurry the F up…

    in reply to: New 1/28 pan chassis, Greyscale Racing MRCG #60857
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    Thanks guys!

    Commercial motor mounts: no, not as the car is currently. I decided on a couple things beforehand…

    – Allow batteries to sit farther back
    – Allow for oil damper
    – Electronics space not sacrificed when using oil damper
    – Allow me to not have to machine a big u-shaped flex plate
    – Allow ride height adjustment

    Which ultimately led to me just saying “the heck with it, I’ll just make my own motor mount.” I hope I made the right decision. 😉

    in reply to: Whic Iwaver did I bought? #60725
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    The late-gen IW02’s (notice the lack of an M) do look like that.

    Here’s Iwaver’s promotional material on it; this came far before the 02M was even mentioned.

    http://video1.hobbico.com/gallery/iwv/iwvd01-deluxe.mpg

    in reply to: Whic Iwaver did I bought? #60717
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    Because it’s a standard IW02? The 02M’s are FM, not out till later… its chassis is also a little bit different (holes for extra plugs).

    in reply to: Wheely annoying #60716
    color0
    Participant
    • Posts: 22

    lol, You should probably just spraypaint the existing R34 rims, it takes quite a bit of work to convert 01/015/02 rims to the 010 mounting style AND keep them all concentric and of equal offset.

Viewing 21 posts - 1 through 21 (of 21 total)