ph2t

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 476 through 500 (of 1,934 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Anyone used the ATOMIC modified motor case? #55991
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    standard closed bb can? and buy the shims you means the brushes yeah dude?

    I got some of those Xtra speed brushes if you wants to try a set out. They were the long one I told yu about a while ago. Good length to mod to correct the alignment against that fatty comm.

    ph2t.

    in reply to: Anyone used the ATOMIC modified motor case? #55981
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    Ok, I’m never buying a closed bb can again! I just put this motor onto my iwaver with a nelly v1.3 and a 9t pinion.

    I clocked 52kph!!!!! Yes that’s 52kph running on only 4 cells!!!!!!

    This motor rocks!

    ph2t.

    in reply to: Anyone used the ATOMIC modified motor case? #55977
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    oh yeah, back to topic.

    well I scored this motor can the other day and I gotta say I’m pretty darn happy with it. :smiley16:

    The neo magents are nice and strong. They are secured with 2 U-clips (not one like usual). They’re on par with the minizworkshop gold neo’s. Not as strong as Draconious’ neo’s from mzr.com. To strong is no good anyway…

    The endbell being a plamsa dash design fits onto the the wider commutator armatures like a glove. That’s why I bought this motor case, purely for this setup. I’ve put an unmodified plasma dash armature in this case. It’s easy to spread the brushes apart by taking unclipping the side metal assembly, pushing that fatty commutator in, then clipping the brushes back in place, viola!

    I broke it in for about 40 minutes, alternating 10 minutes in each direction, using 2 AAA nimh’s. Dry breaking.

    I’m yet to through it on an 01 chassis, it’s currently in the madforce. When I do I’ll give you some speed checker details, see how this puppy performs.

    It’s the fastest motor in the madforce to date though. On 7.4V lipo I’m getting 48kph with a 16t pinion. I removed the neo magnets and put the plasma’s own ferrite magnets in and I got to 56kph.

    Also, this motor plays it cool. Way cooler than the tradiional bb can.

    ph2t out.

    in reply to: Anyone used the ATOMIC modified motor case? #55976
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    is this in a z or an xmod? Id say it’s borderling safe under a high torque application ie: like an xmod with AWD installed.

    2×3 would be safe for sure…

    jamie, what are you running in your xmod?

    ph2t.

    in reply to: my 7.4V li-poly madforce….. #55969
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    Okay, it’s getting scary now.

    Latest top speed, 54kph / 33mph!!!!

    that’s with the following motor.

    ATOMIC bb can (plasma dash type endbell)
    plasma dash armature
    plasma dash magnets

    and a 16t pinion.

    With the same motor but neo magnets it is 48kph!!!! The torque can put it through a wall…..

    ph2t.

    in reply to: Possible new Direct FET replacement found #55900
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    hmmm, on the xmod then it’s gotta be the low drive voltage of 3.4V…. i read on trc that it’s like this, gotta do my own testing yet on the xmod, it’s takeing fuckenforever to strip/clean/rebuild……

    ph2t.

    in reply to: working on the xmod! #55863
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    What a bloody excellent idea chino!

    🙂

    ph2t.

    in reply to: my “Woah Nelly!” Turbo…. #55807
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    Well basically, betty and I set the trend and then all the other Melbourne lemmings follow suit…..

    ph2t.

    in reply to: my “Woah Nelly!” Turbo…. #55794
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    lol, you two are the original odd couple….

    ph2t.

    in reply to: Sunday Racing…..!!!!! #27356
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    cool, if I remember it was a plasma dash armature, plasma dash magnets, in a bb can and carbon (possibly steel?) brushes…..

    ph2t.

    in reply to: Sunday Racing…..!!!!! #27658
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    cool, if I remember it was a plasma dash armature, plasma dash magnets, in a bb can and carbon (possibly steel?) brushes…..

    ph2t.

    in reply to: Sunday Racing…..!!!!! #27360
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    This “magical” bb canned motor of talldudes. Is that the one I sold you mate?

    ph2t.

    in reply to: Sunday Racing…..!!!!! #27662
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    This “magical” bb canned motor of talldudes. Is that the one I sold you mate?

    ph2t.

    in reply to: my “Woah Nelly!” Turbo…. #55788
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088
    Quote:
    How is the development of your web page going ph2t…

    going, not done yet, but soon…..

    Quote:
    And what alloy mount were you running on your mro1(nelly) before dave aquired it and on sold it to me…
    Would like to have a chat about it at some stage
    Cheers M

    I was runing the pn alloy motor mount, I kept it though just in case in the near future I get an iwaver 02. So dave sold you the whole thing? I guess he wasn’t impressed with nelly. :dead:

    ph2t.

    in reply to: my “Woah Nelly!” Turbo…. #55786
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    interesting, the key mate is to figure out a total n chan only h-bridge and therefore getting over the Rds(on) limitation of the p chan mosfets.

    ph2t.

    in reply to: LEO X 1:20 monsters #55767
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    man, do what betty does. just drive around with a car that has neo magnets in it. betty’s found so much stuff previously lost this way, no jokes 🙂

    ph2t.

    in reply to: 16t pinion install #55754
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    lol, that’s the last thing he wants to do….

    just checked it on the tammy speed checker, clocked in at 47kph/29mph!..

    betty, the motor issues are gone now man! I wound a 28 turn @ .4mm on a plasma dash armature, plasma magnets, bb can and modified carbon brushes. it’s land speed is now faster than when you last saw it in it’s prime dude.

    cheers,

    ph2t.

    in reply to: my “Woah Nelly!” Turbo…. #55750
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    lol, it’s cool, I’m happy, hah! I never said you were stealing any business numbnuts! :p

    in reply to: 16t pinion install #55749
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088
    Quote:
    yeah, vid when possible dude… what’s the covers over your shocks do for you:question:

    the rubbers keep the dirt out, I go over all sorts of terrain with this.

    I just used one of those disposible latex gloves, cut at few small rectangles out and fed the top into the thread of the top cap on the oil shock. I actually helps seal the oil better too, which is a funny sorta side outcome. I haven’t secured the bottom though, it’s running loose at the moment. I’m still testing for the best handling setup. I only figured out recently that you can change the springs on the oil shocks (doh! :dead:), so I’ve got some on order, :). I’m sick of using 4 spacers in each shock to stiffen it appropriately, blah!

    ph2t.

    Edited by – ph2t on 27 September 2004 17:17:10

    in reply to: my “Woah Nelly!” Turbo…. #55741
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    ya true jamie, that’s cool :). I know where you’re comming from there, but you know me, I’m really anal when it comes to this stuff…

    good luck on the fets Aaron.

    ph2t.

    in reply to: Possible new Direct FET replacement found #55724
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    jamie, check out my recent posts in my nelly turbo thread, an interesting read! theory shows that nelly is better than that, but it’s reality I guess that makes or breaks the bottom line….

    as for the new fets, a better price and lower Rds(on) is always good, good luck Aaron!

    ph2t.

    in reply to: my “Woah Nelly!” Turbo…. #55723
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    Yeah, it’s a funny thing Aaron. I guess it needs to be said that the measurements taken above were with a DMM. If I had a CRO it would be better. Good only knows how much sampling/approximating is done by the DMM given that it’s reading a PWM output. IF I had a CRO I could map this stuff way more accurately….

    IRF are pushing newer fets these days that have a Vgs of 2.5V, check them out man, there might be a complimentary N/P packaged mosfet out there that fits the pin out of the IRF7389.

    Half my time in this stuff is spent reviewing vendor parametric data tables and that is soooooooo much fun! NOT! :dead:

    ph2t.

    in reply to: OMFG! New Server is FAST #27993
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    good stuff man, can’t wait for it to go into production.

    ph2t.

    in reply to: my “Woah Nelly!” Turbo…. #55702
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    UPDATE: New IMPORTANT info about MOSFET switching in Kyosho/iWaver PCB’s

    Recently, a customer of my Nelly v1.2 turbo sent me this email.

    Quote:
    Dude,

    Update….i went out and got a 7.4V setup of a JK Lithium Cell. Basically i tried a hook up with 7.4V/150mah (max discharge of 8.4V) and 15C of burst. Basically the truck just went up on every single pull of the throttle. However the cell got heated too quick too fast…. Runtime about 2-3 minutes max!

    So i went out and got a 7.4V/350mah setup, ran it parrallel with another identical battery to get 700mah and about 20C of burst on every pull. I hooked up the truck and it flew across my floor fronts wheels up all the way!!! Then all hell broke loose, your Nelly just burst into flames man. Damn!! I guess the current discharge was way too high..

    When I read this I was like, holy crap! That’s like some serious current right there. As I thought about the setup he was using I started thinking that nelly should be alright with this.

    Why did it blow?

    So I started doing some testing. The only 7.4V setup I’m running at the moment is my lipo madforce. That’s running 7.4V/800mAh with a custom plasma dash based motor and the turbo is fine, no overheating, no blow ups….. The version of nelly I was running though was the deluxe version that uses MOSFET driver circuitry to help switch the mosfets on at the increased supply voltage of 7.4V.

    So I thought I’d try a lipo setup just with a nelly v1.2, this version doesn’t have the mosfet driver circuitry, just a plain h-bridge. I hoooked a v1.2 up to a lipo’d iWaver running a plasma dash motor. A basic setup really with the iWaver PCB running now at 7.4V. What I found was that nelly v1.2 DID get hot, but still ran fine. So I took it outside and bashed it around for a while and all was OK. The motor did get hot, nelly got hot but the heat dissipated quickly and everything was OK.

    Now, keep in mind that I’ve tested both v1.2 and v1.1 with a 6 cell nimh setup way back when I was first developing nelly and all is OK. You CAN run it with 6 cells no sweat.

    I guess the key difference here is that lipo batts put out WAY more current than a set of 6 nimh’s/nicd’s. So, moving on from that, the email above shows that this customer run 2 set’s of lipo’s in PARALLEL, making the current going though the circuit incredibly high, hence nelly going up in flames.

    This is where is starts to get interesting…..

    Nelly deluxe barely gets warm on 7.4V 800mah lipo.
    Nelly v1.2 gets hot but still perfoms fine on a 7.4V 800mah lipo.

    Why is this happening? Why is nelly v1.2 dissipating more power than the deluxe version when both turbos are using the same MOSFETS?????

    My first thought was that the mosfets aren’t being turned on as well as they could be. This is an old, established fact in mosfet design. The higher the Gate “turn on” voltage, the lower the operating resistance of the MOSFET. I won’t go into the equations here, but when your resistance is lower, the dissipated power from the MOSFET becomes lower as well.

    Shown below is a typical “On resistance Rds(on)” vs. “Gate drive Vgs” MOSFET graph. This graph is available on practically every MOSFET datasheet available from any vendor who manufactures MOSFETS.

    It shows how as the voltage used to turn the MOSFET on increases, the resistance in the MOSFET decreases.

    The red lines/dots indicate 3 different values for on resistance given the different Gate drive voltage. It’s pretty easy to see that as the voltage on the gate drive increases, the resistance in the MOSFET decreases….

    So, I started to take some measurements and this is where I found the root of the problem. All the readings taken below are real values measured with my DMM. They were taken on a stock iWaver and Kyosho PCB’s that had the original MOSFETS removed and wires soldered in their place for access by my DMM.

    A Stock PCB with 4 cells would only ever drive the (nchan) MOSFETS at 3V. A Stock PCB with lipo would also only drive the (nchan) MOSFETS at 3V!!!!! Given that the supply voltage has increased one would hopefully assume that the Gate drive votlage would of increased as well. Well it doesn’t!!! This is a BIG issue.

    Consider it. The votage has now increased into the circuit, current therefore increases as well. Power dissipated must increase also. But the MOSFETS aren’t any more efficient than they were under the stock setup. This means that even more power will dissipate from the MOSFET pkg’s. Easily setting the stage for a blowup!

    If you refer the the graph above, for 3V (in this case) the on resistance is 0.008 Ohm. Surely it can be better, even with the stock 4 cell setup, I’m loosing an extra 1.8V in turn on voltage that could be used to improve the MOSFETS on resistance down to only 0.002 Ohms!!! (see graph) That’s an increase in efficiency of 400%. See how such a small change can make an even greater
    difference! Reading from the graph again. If I could turn the MOFSETS on at 7.4V I could get the resistiance down to (theoretically) 0.0016 Ohms. That’s an increase in efficiency of 500%!!!

    You see where I’m heading now? The higher gate voltage is clearly the key in being able to get the greatest peformance out of the MOSFETS.

    So from this I started doing futher research on MOSFET DRIVERS. These components are available from several different vendors and appear to be very popular in the industry now, given by the shear amount of different models available across the market. MOSFET drivers are designed purely to drive MOSFET switches. They have no other function.

    So I created a custom PCB of a nelly v1.2 and added a pair of MOSFET drivers that I got from Texas Instruments. Shown below is the test PCB WITHOUT the mosfets on it, just the MOSFET drivers.

    Here’s a photo of the test setup. I used this to switch between a 4 cell stock setup and a lipo 7.4V 800mah setup. I took my measurements in circuit whilst the car was on.

    See the (2nd half) of the table above for my results. As you can see now the (nchan) MOSFETS are being turned on at 5V, not 3V anymore. So I now have a clear performance gain. At 7.4V the (nchan) MOSFETS are now being turned on a 8V. A clear improvment!

    I will finish the assembly of the custom turbo soon and start some real world testing and see if the theoretical improvements make an acutal PHYSICAL improvement. I believe it will though, just a matter of testing it.

    So you can now see that for stock PCB’s and mosfet stacked PCB’s, YOU ARE LOSING A FAIR AMOUNT OF POSSIBLE PERFORMACE BY NOT DRIVING THE MOSFETS AT A HIGHER GATE VOLTAGE!

    Needles to say that Nelly v1.3 will be including this MOSFET driver technology, :).

    Sorry for such a huge rant but I wanted to show people in detail what is happening and hopefully my writing hasn’t been too much techo speak as I hope people can glean some further insight into what exactly is happening under the hood!

    Cheers,

    ph2t.

    Edited by – ph2t on 26 September 2004 09:31:30

    in reply to: New Parts Shipments! #55647
    ph2t
    Participant
    • Posts: 2088

    I’ll take two sets of alloy nuts please dude. PM me your account details.

    thanks,

    ph2t.

Viewing 25 posts - 476 through 500 (of 1,934 total)